Credible carbon dating
Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.
Along with hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur, carbon is a building block of biochemical molecules ranging from fats, proteins, and carbohydrates to active substances such as hormones.However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements.Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.In radiocarbon dating terms this makes the atmosphere appear older, which is reflected in the tissues of plants taking in CO during photosynthesis, and their products such as cottons.At the rate fossil fuel emissions are currently increasing, by 2050 a new T-shirt would have the same radiocarbon date as a robe worn by William the Conqueror a thousand years earlier.The scientists seem unaware of carbon-14 reported from coal (9/25/03), diamonds, and dinosaur bones (see 6/18/15).
As soon as a living organism dies, it stops taking in new carbon.
Within the physical limitations of the technique and theoretical work behind it (you can't use it on very young things and it doesn't work when you go too far back), yes, it is extremely reliable.
Objects have been carbon-dated and the results were within weeks of the known date of origin; the error values of experimentation were far greater than the actual difference between dated and known times.
We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.
This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound.
Carbon-13 and carbon-14 are thus isotopes of carbon-12.